Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Vivo |
| Android 13 | Android 14 |
| -- | 2024-04-03 |
| -- | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| -- | 7.73 ounces |
| -- | Black and White |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2640 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 426 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 6.21 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 7.04 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3640mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a global score of 77.8, which is just a bit better than the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra's 73.1 general score. Both devices in this comparison use Android OS (Operating System), but the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has newer 14 version and Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has Android 13 version. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much more vibrant screen than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because although it has a just a bit lower screen pixel density, it also counts with a larger screen and a higher resolution of 2200 x 2480px.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because it has more internal memory capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a bit superior CPU than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because it has a greater amount of RAM and more cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a very superior camera than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because it has a camera in the back with a way higher 50 megapixels resolution.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a way better battery performance than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because it has a 57% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.