Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2025-04-24 | 2017-09-15 |
| -- | 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| -- | Deep Sea blue, Maple gold, Midnight black and Orchid gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 440.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| -- | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| LTPO | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 522 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note8 has an overall score of 83, which is a bit better than the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025)'s global score of 79.2. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but Galaxy Note8 has newer 9.0 Pie version while Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has Android 15. Samsung Galaxy Note8 has a much faster processor than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy Note8 has a much better looking display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a quite smaller screen. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a much bigger memory to install applications and games than Galaxy Note8, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 448 GB more internal memory capacity.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a superior battery performance than Galaxy Note8, because it has a 4700mAh battery capacity. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) takes much better photos and videos than Galaxy Note8, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a camera in the back with lot more mega pixels and a much better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.