Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 49.3 | 53.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| Android 4.0 | Windows Phone 8 |
| -- | 2012-12-05 |
| 5.06 x 2.59 x 0.33 inches | 4.54 x 2.41 x 0.43 inches |
| 4.59 ounces | 4.48 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Green, Orange, Pink and White |
| Kevlar | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 149.00 | $ 140.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 3.8 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 480 x 800 pixels |
| LCD | IPS LCD |
| 256 pixels per inch | 246 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.4 | 7.7 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8227 chipset |
| Dual-Core 1200 MHz processor | Krait (Dual-Core 1000 MHz) processor |
| -- | 512 MB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 305 GPU |
| 7.65 | 7.56 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 8 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 1.32 | 5.06 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP | 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP |
| -- | f/2.40 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution |
| 5.94 | 7.59 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| SIM | Micro SIM |
| 3.6 | 4.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1780mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 1300mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 14.6 hours talk time |
| 3.68 | 3.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Lumia 620 is slightly better than the Motorola RAZR V, having a 53.5 score against 49.3. Lumia 620 is a extremely thicker but just a little bit lighter cellphone than Motorola RAZR V. The Lumia 620 comes with Windows Phone 8 OS, and Motorola RAZR V has Android 4.0 OS. The Motorola RAZR V counts with a bit better processor than Nokia Lumia 620. Both have 2 cpu cores.
Nokia Lumia 620 has a bit sharper screen than Motorola RAZR V, although it has a quite lower resolution of 800 x 480 pixels, a little bit worse amount of pixels per inch in the display and a bit smaller screen. The Nokia Lumia 620 has much more memory to store more games and applications than Motorola RAZR V, because it has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 64 GB.
The Motorola RAZR V has a really longer battery lifetime than Nokia Lumia 620, because it has 1780mAh of battery capacity instead of 1300mAh. Nokia Lumia 620 counts with a greater camera than Motorola RAZR V, although it has a way lower resolution back facing camera.
Nokia Lumia 620 is not only the best devices between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheap compared to the other phone, which makes this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.