Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 51.5 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 2.3, 2.2 | Android 10 |
| 2011-05-05 | 2018-10-18 |
| 4.70 x 2.40 x 0.51 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.10 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| -- | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 320 x 480 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 186 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| TI OMAP3620 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Single-Core 1000 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 7.38 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 1 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 2.72 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 720 x 480 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 6.05 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1860mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 380 hours standby time 9 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.76 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ is way better than Motorola XPRT, with an 81.2 score against 51.5. LG V40 ThinQ's construction is a lot newer and incredibly thinner, but also heavier than the Motorola XPRT. Both devices in this comparison work with Android OS, but the LG V40 ThinQ has the newer 10 version and Motorola XPRT has Android 2.3 version, so it offers a lot of extra features and enhanced performance.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with a way better display than Motorola XPRT, because it has a much higher amount of pixels per inch of screen, a way better resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels and a way larger screen. LG V40 ThinQ features a much powerful processing unit than Motorola XPRT, because it has a higher number of cores and 5,5 GB more RAM memory.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with much more memory to store more games and applications than Motorola XPRT, because it has more internal memory capacity and a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB. The LG V40 ThinQ has a superior battery life than Motorola XPRT, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
The LG V40 ThinQ features a greater camera than Motorola XPRT, because it has a back facing camera with much more mega pixels and a lot higher video resolution.
LG V40 ThinQ costs a bit more than the Motorola XPRT, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.