Search


Compare phones

Global Score
27.730.3
Basic Information
NokiaSamsung
2011-08-252009-02-06
4.33 x 1.79 x 0.59 inches4.14 x 1.74 x 0.58 inches
2.47 ounces2.34 ounces
Black, Blue, Pink and Red--
Scratch-Resistant Glass--
$ 640.00$ 205.00
Display / Screen
1.8 inches1.5 inches
128 x 160 pixels 128 x 128 pixels
TFTCSTN
114 pixels per inch121 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
5.35.4
processor processor
ARM Mali-400 MP1 (320 MHz) GPU GPU
5.945.76
No SD card slotNo SD card slot
GSMGSM
SIMSIM
0.10.1
Battery Life
800mAh Li-Ion Battery800mAh Li-Polymer Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
840 hours standby time
7.2 hours talk time
250 hours standby time
6 hours talk time
2.242.24
--FM Radio

Comparison review

Samsung E1125 has a score of 30.3, which is a bit better than Nokia 100's 27.7 overall score. The Samsung E1125 design is just a little bit lighter and just a bit thinner than the Nokia 100, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. Samsung E1125 counts with a little more vivid screen than Nokia 100, because although it has a bit lower 128 x 128 resolution and a little smaller display, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per display inch.

Nokia 100 has a bit more powerful processor than Samsung E1125, and although they both have a 0-Core processing unit, the Nokia 100 also has a GPU. The Samsung E1125's memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos is very similar to Nokia 100's one. Samsung E1125 has a battery lifetime that's just as good as Nokia 100's battery life.

Nokia 100 and Samsung E1125 both feature really similar cameras.

Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Samsung E1125 is also by far the cheapest one, making it an obvious call.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.