Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2018-12-21 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Blue, Brown and Silver | Black and Blue |
| Glass and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 407 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola DROID Turbo has an overall score of 77.9, which is just a bit better than the Nokia 8.1's global score of 72.1. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola DROID Turbo has the newer 4.4.4 version and Nokia 8.1 has Android 10 version. Motorola DROID Turbo's construction is a little lighter than Nokia 8.1, but it is noticeably thicker and was released many years before.
Motorola DROID Turbo features a bit more powerful processor than Nokia 8.1, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a graphics processing unit. Motorola DROID Turbo has a sharper screen than Nokia 8.1, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a higher pixel count per inch in the screen.
The Motorola DROID Turbo shoots slightly better pictures and videos than Nokia 8.1, because although it has lower 24 frames per second video frame rates and a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with a much better resolution camera.
The Nokia 8.1 features a much bigger storage for applications and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Nokia 8.1 also has an external memory card slot that supports up to 400 GB. Motorola DROID Turbo has a little longer battery life than Nokia 8.1, because it has 3900mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.