Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 15 |
| 2018-12-21 | 2025-04-24 |
| 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Blue, Brown and Silver | -- |
| Glass and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | -- |
| IPS LCD | LTPO |
| 407 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a global score of 79.2, which is just a bit better than the Nokia 8.1's overall score of 72.1. Both devices in our current comparison come with Android OS, but the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a newer 15 version and Nokia 8.1 has Android 10 version, so it gives a couple additional features. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is a incredibly newer and noticeably thinner phone than the Nokia 8.1, although it is just a little heavier.
The Nokia 8.1 counts with a much more vibrant screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a little smaller display. Nokia 8.1 counts with a very superior processing unit than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has 12 GB lesser RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) captures greater videos and photos than Nokia 8.1, and although they both have the same aperture, the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) also has a much better video definition and a back-facing camera with a lot better 50 mega-pixels resolution.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a way bigger storage to install applications and games than Nokia 8.1, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a much better battery duration than Nokia 8.1, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.