Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | HTC |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-12 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Meteor grey | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 700.00 | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| LCD | S-LCD 5 |
| 387 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Nokia 8 V 5G UW is a bit better than the HTC U11, with a global score of 80.3 against 77.6. Nokia 8 V 5G UW's body is newer than the HTC U11's, although it is extremely heavier and thicker. The HTC U11 counts with a slightly better display than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a better pixel density.
The HTC U11 features a bit better hardware performance than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Nokia 8 V 5G UW counts with a much better camera than HTC U11, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also counts with higher video frame rate, a back facing camera with much more MP and a way bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW features a much better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC U11, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1000 GB. Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a really longer battery lifetime than HTC U11, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Although Nokia 8 V 5G UW is a better device, it costs a lot more than HTC U11, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the HTC U11. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get HTC U11, and give up a couple features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.