Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-11-12 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Meteor grey | 16 777 216 |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 700.00 | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a score of 80.3, which is a little bit better than Moto Z3's global score of 77.6. Nokia 8 V 5G UW's construction is incredibly newer, but a lot heavier and noticeably thicker than the Moto Z3. Both phones in this comparison use Android OS (operating system), but the Nokia 8 V 5G UW has 10 version while Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie.
Motorola Moto Z3 features a little faster processing unit than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. Motorola Moto Z3 counts with a little bit better screen than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2160px and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher pixel density.
Motorola Moto Z3 has a quite bigger storage for games and applications than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto Z3 also has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Nokia 8 V 5G UW shoots greater photos and videos than Moto Z3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also has a bigger aperture for better low light photos and videos, a lot more megapixels camera, higher video frame rate and a way larger back camera sensor providing a much higher image quality.
Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a much longer battery performance than Moto Z3, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Although Nokia 8 V 5G UW is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola Moto Z3, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola Moto Z3. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Nokia 8 V 5G UW, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Motorola Moto Z3, giving up a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.