Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-12 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Meteor grey | -- |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 700.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 is better than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, having a general score of 90.7 against 80.3. The Galaxy A52 body is a bit thinner and lighter than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, even when both were only released with a few months difference. The Galaxy A52 and Nokia 8 V 5G UW count with similar CPUs, both have 6 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores.
The Galaxy A52 counts with a little bit better screen than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a little bit better pixels density. Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a bit better camera than Galaxy A52, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, a F1.8 camera aperture, the same back-facing camera sensor size and a same resolution camera, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also has higher video frame rates.
Samsung Galaxy A52 has more memory for applications and games than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because it has an external memory slot that supports up to 1 TB and more internal memory. Galaxy A52's battery performance is just as good as the battery performance in Nokia 8 V 5G UW.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.