Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-11-12 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Meteor grey | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 700.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.98 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold is much better than the Nokia 8 V 5G UW, having a overall score of 97.6 against 80.3. Samsung Galaxy Fold is an older and somewhat heavier phone than the Nokia 8 V 5G UW, but Samsung made it extremely thinner anyway. Both phones we compare here come with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Fold has the newer 9.0 Pie version and Nokia 8 V 5G UW has Android 10 version.
The Galaxy Fold counts with a bit more powerful processor than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Fold also has more RAM. Galaxy Fold and Nokia 8 V 5G UW feature similar screens, because although the Galaxy Fold has a just a bit less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a quite better 1536 x 2152 resolution and a quite bigger screen.
Samsung Galaxy Fold has a superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a greater camera than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also counts with a lot more mega pixels back facing camera and a much larger back-facing camera sensor capturing much better quality videos and pictures.
Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a bit superior battery life than Galaxy Fold, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Fold is a lot more expensive than the Nokia 8 V 5G UW, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.