Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-08-28 | 2020-11-06 |
| 5.96 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Blue, Brown and Silver | Titan gray |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 449.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 554 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.57 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3090mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.04 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG K92 has a global score of 85.4, which is much better than Nokia 8's overall score of 73.8. LG K92's design is noticeably newer, but a bit thicker and heavier than Nokia 8. The Nokia 8 counts with a sharper screen than LG K92, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a higher amount of pixels per inch in the screen.
LG K92 counts with a much better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Nokia 8, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB. Nokia 8 has a bit better hardware performance than LG K92, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
The LG K92 has greater battery performance than Nokia 8, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3090mAh. The LG K92 captures much better videos and photos than Nokia 8, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the LG K92 also has a much more MP camera, a larger camera aperture for better photography and video in low-light situations and a way larger camera sensor shooting way better quality videos and photos.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the LG K92 is also cheap compared to the Nokia 8, which makes this phone a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.