Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-08-28 | -- |
| 5.96 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 8.32 ounces |
| Blue, Brown and Silver | Black Shadow |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 449.00 | $ 2020.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2184 x 1968 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 554 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 9.57 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3090mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a score of 91.1, which is much better than the Nokia 8's overall score of 73.8. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition design is much thinner but notably heavier than Nokia 8. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition counts with just a bit better display than Nokia 8, because although it has a way worse count of pixels in each inch in the screen, it also counts with a much brighter display, a bit higher 1968 x 2184 resolution and a really larger screen.
Nokia 8 features a really superior hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition counts with a much better camera than Nokia 8, because it has a back camera with a much better 200 megapixels resolution and a bigger aperture for better photos in poorly lited environments.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features a much greater memory for applications and games than Nokia 8, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal memory. The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition counts with a much better battery duration than Nokia 8, because it has a 42 percent larger battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Nokia 8, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Nokia 8. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the Nokia 8, resigning a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.