Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | HTC |
| 2019-03-03 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Blue | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 699.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 537 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The HTC U Ultra has an overall score of 77, which is a bit better than the Nokia 9 PureView's 76.4 general score. HTC U Ultra is a a little lighter phone than Nokia 9 PureView, but both of them are 0.31inches thick. Nokia 9 PureView counts with a bit better processing power than HTC U Ultra, because it has a larger number of cores and a greater amount of RAM memory.
Nokia 9 PureView counts with a little bit better display than HTC U Ultra, because it has a little bit higher number of pixels per display inch, a bit larger display and a quite better 1440 x 2880 resolution. HTC U Ultra features a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Nokia 9 PureView, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
HTC U Ultra features a slightly better camera than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a camera with a 12 mega pixels and a same size diafragm aperture, the HTC U Ultra also has a larger sensor. The Nokia 9 PureView has a bit superior battery performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has 3320mAh of battery capacity.
Although HTC U Ultra is a better device, it costs a little more than the Nokia 9 PureView, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Nokia 9 PureView. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get the Nokia 9 PureView, letting go a couple features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.