Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-03-03 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Blue | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 699.00 | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 FE has a global score of 90.8, which is better than the Nokia 9 PureView's score of 76.4. The Galaxy S20 FE construction is newer, but just a little heavier and a bit thicker than Nokia 9 PureView. Galaxy S20 FE has a processor that is very similar to the processor in Nokia 9 PureView, both have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM memory amount.
The Nokia 9 PureView counts with a bit better looking display than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2880 resolution and a better pixel density. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a very superior memory to store more games and applications than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1000 GB.
Galaxy S20 FE features a bit better camera than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a same resolution back camera, the Galaxy S20 FE also has a way larger back camera sensor shooting way higher quality pictures and higher video frame rate.
The Galaxy S20 FE has superior battery duration than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has a 36% more battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we compare here, Galaxy S20 FE is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.