Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.84 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Midnight Sun and Ocean Blue | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 253 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 XL is much better than Nokia G50, getting an 82.5 score against 74.5. Google Pixel 2 XL's design is extremely lighter and thinner than the Nokia G50. Google Pixel 2 XL has a little faster processing unit than Nokia G50. Both have 8 processing cores and a 4 GB RAM. Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a lot better looking display than Nokia G50, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with much more pixels per inch in the screen and a lot better resolution of 1440 x 2880px.
The Nokia G50 captures clearer pictures and videos than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the same 30 fps video frame rate and a F1.8 aperture, the Nokia G50 also has a camera in the back with a much higher resolution. The Nokia G50 counts with a bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
The Nokia G50 counts with a really longer battery performance than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3520mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.