Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | HTC |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.84 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Midnight Sun and Ocean Blue | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 5 |
| 253 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
HTC U Ultra is just a bit better than the Nokia G50, getting a 77 score against 74.5. HTC U Ultra is a way lighter and thinner phone than Nokia G50. HTC U Ultra counts with a much better display than Nokia G50, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a lot more pixels per inch of display.
The Nokia G50 counts with a bit more powerful processor than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Nokia G50 also has 4 more processing cores (but slower). The Nokia G50 features a slightly better camera than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same video resolution, the same diafragm aperture and the same video frame rates, the Nokia G50 also has a much better resolution back facing camera.
HTC U Ultra counts with a superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Nokia G50, and although they both have the same internal memory, the HTC U Ultra also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. Nokia G50 has a superior battery duration than HTC U Ultra, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.