Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 53.5 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| Windows Phone 8.1 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2014-07-23 | 2014-10-28 |
| 4.71 x 2.45 x 0.46 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 4.55 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Green, Orange and White | Black and Blue |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 180.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 480 x 854 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| LCD | AMOLED |
| 245 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 302 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 4.82 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | -- |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 6.27 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1430mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 528 hours standby time 13.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.2 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Droid Turbo is way better than Nokia Lumia 530, having a global score of 76.4 against 53.5. The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with Android 4.4.4 operating system, and Nokia Lumia 530 counts with Windows Phone 8.1 operating system. Although Motorola Droid Turbo and Nokia Lumia 530 were released with only a couple of months difference, Motorola Droid Turbo's construction is extremely heavier but just a bit thinner than Nokia Lumia 530.
Motorola Droid Turbo features a way better display than Lumia 530, because it has a larger display, a way higher pixels count per inch of screen and a lot better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels. The Motorola Droid Turbo features a better CPU than Lumia 530, and although they both have 4 processing cores, the Motorola Droid Turbo also has a larger amount of RAM and a better 500 MHz GPU.
The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a much greater storage capacity to store more apps and games than Lumia 530, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 28 GB more internal storage. Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a really longer battery duration than Lumia 530, because it has a 3900mAh battery capacity.
The Motorola Droid Turbo features a very superior camera than Nokia Lumia 530, because it has a way more megapixels camera and a bigger aperture to take better photos in low-light situations.
Even being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Motorola Droid Turbo is also a bit cheaper, which makes this phone an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.