Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 55.7 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| Windows Phone 8.1 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2014-04-02 | 2014-10-28 |
| 5.10 x 2.63 x 0.36 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Green, White and Yellow | Black and Blue |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 140.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 480 x 854 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 218 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.6 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 305 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.62 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.15 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1830mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 600 hours standby time 16.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.68 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola DROID Turbo is much better than Lumia 630, having a score of 77.9 against 55.7. Although the Motorola DROID Turbo is better than Lumia 630, we must note that it's also a notably heavier and thicker cellphone. Motorola DROID Turbo counts with Android 4.4.4 OS, and Lumia 630 counts with Windows Phone 8.1 OS.
The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a much sharper screen than Nokia Lumia 630, because it has a lot better 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution, a larger screen and a lot better pixels density. Motorola DROID Turbo has a much greater storage to store more games and applications than Lumia 630, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 56 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Motorola DROID Turbo features a superior CPU than Nokia Lumia 630, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola DROID Turbo also has 2,5 GB more RAM memory and a faster 500 MHz GPU. The Motorola DROID Turbo has a very superior battery life than Lumia 630, because it has a 113 percent greater battery size.
Motorola DROID Turbo takes a lot better pictures and videos than Lumia 630, because it has a much more mega pixels back facing camera, a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light captures and video and a way better (4K) video resolution.
The Motorola DROID Turbo is not only the best phones in this comparison, but it's also cheaper than the other phone, which makes this phone an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.