Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 61.1 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| Windows Phone 8 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2012-10-29 | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.03 x 2.69 x 0.44 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 4.99 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Mystic indigo |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 300.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 217 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.16 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.20 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.25 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.8 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 254 hours standby time 10.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G Stylus has a global score of 79.7, which is way better than the Lumia 822's 61.1 score. Moto G Stylus's design is much newer and somewhat thinner, but incredibly heavier than the Lumia 822. The Moto G Stylus works with Android 11 operating system, and Lumia 822 has Windows Phone 8 operating system.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus counts with a bit better processing unit than Lumia 822, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with a higher number of cores and a larger amount of RAM memory. The Motorola Moto G Stylus features a bit sharper screen than Lumia 822, because it has a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2300px, a lot larger screen and a way higher pixel density.
The Moto G Stylus features a way bigger memory to install games and applications than Lumia 822, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 512 GB. The Moto G Stylus counts with a much longer battery duration than Lumia 822, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 1800mAh.
Moto G Stylus captures much better pictures and videos than Nokia Lumia 822, because it has a much better (4K) video resolution, a back-facing camera with way more megapixels and a lot larger diafragm aperture to take better photos and videos in low light situations.
The Moto G Stylus and the Lumia 822 cost exactly the same, making buying this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.