Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 56 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| Windows Phone 7.8, 7.5 Refresh, 7.5 Mango | -- |
| 2012-01-09 | 2017-10-19 |
| 5.03 x 2.70 x 0.45 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 5 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 217 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S2 APQ8055 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Scorpion (Single-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB (333 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 205 (245 MHz) GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 7.92 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 4.4 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 4.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1830mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 350 hours standby time 7 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.68 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 has a global score of 81.6, which is a lot better than Nokia Lumia 900's score of 56. Google Pixel 2 is a way newer phone, and it's also thinner and somewhat lighter than Nokia Lumia 900. Google Pixel 2 has a much better looking screen than Lumia 900, because it has a bigger display, a much higher 1080 x 1920 resolution and a much better display pixels density.
Google Pixel 2 counts with a better CPU than Lumia 900, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, it also counts with a greater number of cores (and faster) and a larger amount of RAM. Google Pixel 2 counts with a much bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Lumia 900, because it has 128 GB internal memory.
The Google Pixel 2 features a very superior battery life than Nokia Lumia 900, because it has a 48% larger battery size. The Google Pixel 2 shoots greater photographs and videos than Nokia Lumia 900, because it has a camera in the back with a way higher resolution, a way better video resolution and a larger diafragm aperture to take better low light photos.
Google Pixel 2 is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheaper than the Lumia 900.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.