Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 64.1 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| Windows Phone 8 | -- |
| 2012-09-05 | 2017-10-19 |
| 5.13 x 2.79 x 0.42 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Gray, Red, White and Yellow | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 768 x 1280 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 332 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 8.70 MP + 1.30 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 460 hours standby time 18.6 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 has a score of 81.6, which is way better than Nokia Lumia 920's 64.1 overall score. The Google Pixel 2 is a notably newer phone, and it's also way thinner and noticeably lighter than the Nokia Lumia 920. The Google Pixel 2 has a better performance than Lumia 920, because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with more RAM memory and more cores.
Nokia Lumia 920 counts with a little bit better looking screen than Google Pixel 2, although it has a bit worse quantity of pixels per screen inch, a way lower 1280 x 768 resolution and a little smaller screen. Google Pixel 2 features a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Lumia 920, because it has more internal storage capacity.
Google Pixel 2 features longer battery duration than Nokia Lumia 920, because it has 2700mAh of battery capacity. The Google Pixel 2 counts with a much better camera than Lumia 920, because it has a back facing camera with a way higher 12.2 mega-pixels resolution, a larger sensor providing a better image quality, a larger aperture to capture better low light photography and videos and a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Google Pixel 2 not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also cheap compared to the Nokia Lumia 920.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.