Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.8 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-07-29 | 2019-08-16 |
| 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 10.02 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Granite Gre and Ultra Blue | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 550.00 | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4630mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Nokia XR20 has a score of 80.8, which is just a bit better than the Motorola One Action's 78.5 score. Nokia XR20 is a newer device than the Motorola One Action, although it is thicker and extremely heavier. The Motorola One Action's CPU is very similar to the Nokia XR20 one, and although the Motorola One Action has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Nokia XR20 features a little sharper screen than Motorola One Action, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a just a bit worse quantity of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a bit larger screen. Motorola One Action counts with just a bit bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Nokia XR20, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Motorola One Action also has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
Nokia XR20 features improved battery duration than Motorola One Action, because it has a 32% greater battery capacity. Nokia XR20 shoots much better photos and videos than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same camera aperture and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Nokia XR20 also has a back camera with much more mega-pixels and higher 60 frames per second video frame rates.
Although Nokia XR20 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola One Action, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola One Action. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Nokia XR20, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the Motorola One Action, letting go some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.