Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.8 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-07-29 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 10.02 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Granite Gre and Ultra Blue | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 550.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4630mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 is better than Nokia XR20, with a general score of 90.7 against 80.8. Although Galaxy A52 and the Nokia XR20 were released with only 4 months difference, Galaxy A52 is much thinner and noticeably lighter. The Samsung Galaxy A52 features just a bit better processing power than Nokia XR20. Both of them have a 6 GB RAM and 8 cores.
The Nokia XR20 features a slightly better screen than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has a just a little worse number of pixels per inch of screen, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the Nokia XR20 also counts with a bit larger screen. The Galaxy A52 has a bit bigger storage to install applications and games than Nokia XR20, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A52 also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a much better camera than Nokia XR20, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a way bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a much higher 3840x2160 video quality and a camera in the back with lot more MP. The Nokia XR20 has just a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy A52, because it has 4630mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.