Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.8 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2021-07-29 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 10.02 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Granite Gre and Ultra Blue | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 550.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4630mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G is much better than Nokia XR20, with a 91.3 score against 80.8. Galaxy A52 5G's body is notably lighter and extremely thinner than the Nokia XR20, even though both of them were only released with a few months difference. These phones work with Android OS, but the Galaxy A52 5G has a newer 12 version while Nokia XR20 has Android 11, so it provides you a lot of extra features and increased performance.
Galaxy A52 5G has a bit more powerful processor than Nokia XR20. Both have 6 GB of RAM and 8 cores. Nokia XR20 features a bit sharper display than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a bit worse pixels quantity in each inch in the display, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Nokia XR20 also counts with a quite bigger screen.
The Galaxy A52 5G features a superior camera than Nokia XR20, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a way larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a lot more mega pixels back-facing camera. The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a slightly better memory capacity for games and applications than Nokia XR20, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Galaxy A52 5G also has an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
The Nokia XR20 has just a little better battery life than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a 3% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.