Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.8 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-07-29 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 10.02 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Granite Gre and Ultra Blue | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 550.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4630mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10e is just a bit better than the Nokia XR20, getting a score of 86.3 against 80.8. Galaxy S10e is an a lot older cellphone than the Nokia XR20, but it is way thinner and a lot lighter anyway. Samsung Galaxy S10e features just a bit better hardware performance than Nokia XR20. They have 6 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores.
Nokia XR20 has a bit sharper screen than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a just a bit lower pixels count in each inch of display, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a larger screen. The Samsung Galaxy S10e's memory for games and applications is very similar to Nokia XR20's one, both have a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB and the same 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Nokia XR20 shoots just a bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for low-light photos, and they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 video quality, the Nokia XR20 also counts with a lot higher resolution back camera and a bigger sensor providing a higher image quality.
Nokia XR20 counts with a much longer battery duration than Galaxy S10e, because it has 4630mAh of battery capacity against 3100mAh.
The Galaxy S10e not only is the best devices between the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest one, which makes this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.