Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.8 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-07-29 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 10.02 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Granite Gre and Ultra Blue | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 550.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 10.89 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4630mAh Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 3 is slightly better than Nokia XR20, having a overall score of 85.6 against 80.8. Galaxy Z Flip 3's body is extremely lighter and way thinner than the Nokia XR20, although both were only released with a couple of months difference. These phones include the same Android 11 OS (Operating System).
Nokia XR20 has a slightly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, although it has a quite worse number of pixels per inch in the screen and a bit lower 1080 x 2400px resolution, they both have a screen of the same size. Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a little faster processor than Nokia XR20, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has more RAM memory.
Nokia XR20 has a much better storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Nokia XR20 also has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Nokia XR20 counts with a very superior battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 40 percent greater battery capacity.
The Nokia XR20 features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have the same aperture, the Nokia XR20 also has a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution.
Although Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Nokia XR20, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Nokia XR20. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy Nokia XR20, giving up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.