Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.8 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Vivo |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-07-29 | 2021-09-30 |
| 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 10.02 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Granite Gre and Ultra Blue | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 550.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.89 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4630mAh Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Nokia XR20 has a score of 80.8, which is a bit better than the vivo X70 Pro's 78.3 global score. Although Nokia XR20 is better than vivo X70 Pro, it must be told that it's also a notably thicker and notably heavier phone. Both of these phones use the same Android 11 operating system, so they should count with all the same operating system features.
The vivo X70 Pro counts with just a little better processing power than Nokia XR20, and although they both have 8 cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has more RAM memory. The Nokia XR20 has a slightly better looking display than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a bit worse count of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a bit bigger screen and a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Nokia XR20 features a bit bigger storage capacity for applications and games than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits up to 512 GB. The Nokia XR20 has a little longer battery duration than vivo X70 Pro, because it has a 4630mAh battery size instead of 4450mAh.
The vivo X70 Pro has a better camera than Nokia XR20, because it has a back facing camera with a better resolution, a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better images and video in low-light situations, a much better (4K) video resolution and a much larger camera sensor taking much better quality videos and photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.