Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2023-07-11 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.38 x 3.01 x 0.34 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.10 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2412 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 394 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
HTC U Ultra has a score of 77, which is a bit better than Nothing Phone (2)'s 75.6 general score. Despite of the fact that the HTC U Ultra is a lot older than the Nothing Phone (2), it's body is lighter and just a little thinner. Nothing Phone (2) counts with a slightly better looking screen than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a quite worse number of pixels per inch in the screen and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2412 pixels, it also counts with a larger display.
The HTC U Ultra features a lot bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Nothing Phone (2), because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Nothing Phone (2) features a better processor than HTC U Ultra, because it has 4 GB more RAM memory and a larger number of cores.
The Nothing Phone (2) takes way better photos and videos than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for low light captures and video, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Nothing Phone (2) also counts with better video frame rates, a camera in the back with a way better resolution and a lot bigger sensor which gives a way higher image and video quality.
The Nothing Phone (2) features a much better battery lifetime than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 57% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.