Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-27 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black and Red | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has a global score of 81.3, which is a little bit better than nubia Red Magic 3's 75.6 overall score. LG V35 ThinQ is an older phone than nubia Red Magic 3, but it's way lighter and extremely thinner anyway. Nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a bit faster CPU than LG V35 ThinQ, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has 6 GB more RAM.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit better looking screen than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2880 and a greater number of pixels per display inch. The nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a much better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for capturing photos and video in low-light situations, it also counts with a much higher resolution back facing camera, a much better video quality and a much larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
LG V35 ThinQ features a greater storage to install applications and games than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a much longer battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, LG V35 ThinQ is also by far the cheapest one, making it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.