Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-05-27 | 2020-04-27 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black and Red | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A31 is just a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3, getting an 81.3 score against 75.6. The Samsung Galaxy A31 is a newer device, and it is also thinner and lighter than nubia Red Magic 3. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A31 has older 10 version while nubia Red Magic 3 has Android 9.0 Pie.
Galaxy A31 has a screen that's very similar to the nubia Red Magic 3 one, because although the Galaxy A31 has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a little bit better screen pixel density. The nubia Red Magic 3 features a bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A31, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory.
Nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A31, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has more RAM memory. The nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A31, and although they both have a same size back camera sensor and a same resolution back facing camera, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has a way better 7680x4320 video definition and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better photography and video in poorly lited environments.
Galaxy A31 has a battery life that's very similar to the nubia Red Magic 3 one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.