Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11 |
| 2019-05-27 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black and Red | -- |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a general score of 91.3, which is much better than the nubia Red Magic 3's 75.6 overall score. These devices use Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has the older 12 version and nubia Red Magic 3 has Android 9.0 Pie. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G design is newer, lighter and somewhat thinner than nubia Red Magic 3.
Nubia Red Magic 3 has a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has more RAM. Galaxy A52 5G and nubia Red Magic 3 have incredibly similar screens, because although the Galaxy A52 5G has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit greater number of pixels in each inch in the display and a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Galaxy A52 5G features a greater storage for games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1 TB. The nubia Red Magic 3 has a little longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy A52 5G captures clearer pictures and videos than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with higher 30 frames per second video frame rate, a bigger camera sensor which gives a better image and video quality and a way more mega-pixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.