Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-05-27 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black and Red | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52s is much better than nubia Red Magic 3, getting a general score of 91.1 against 75.6. Samsung Galaxy A52s is a much newer phone, and it's also somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than nubia Red Magic 3. Both phones in this comparison come with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A52s has the older 11 version while nubia Red Magic 3 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Samsung Galaxy A52s features a screen that's very similar to the nubia Red Magic 3 one, because although the Samsung Galaxy A52s has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little greater pixels amount in each inch in the display and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. Nubia Red Magic 3 has just a little better processing power than Galaxy A52s, and although they both have 8 cores, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has a larger amount of RAM.
Galaxy A52s has a better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1 TB. The nubia Red Magic 3 features a bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because it has an 11% more battery size.
The Galaxy A52s counts with a slightly better camera than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for low-light photography and video, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A52s also counts with faster video frame rates, a bigger back camera sensor shooting better quality photographs and a back facing camera with a lot better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.