Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 89.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-05-27 | 2022-01-11 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.13 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black and Red | -- |
| Aluminum | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S21 FE has a global score of 89.1, which is better than the nubia Red Magic 3's 75.6 general score. Galaxy S21 FE is a much newer phone, and it is also a lot lighter and thinner than the nubia Red Magic 3. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S21 FE has 11 version while nubia Red Magic 3 has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Galaxy S21 FE has a little bit better screen than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2340px resolution, the Galaxy S21 FE also counts with a bit higher number of pixels per inch in the screen. Nubia Red Magic 3 has a little bit better performance than Galaxy S21 FE, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has a larger amount of RAM.
Nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a much better camera than Galaxy S21 FE, because it has a much better video definition, a back-facing camera with way more megapixels and a larger diafragm aperture. The nubia Red Magic 3 counts with much more memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S21 FE, because it has 128 GB more internal memory.
Nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a bit superior battery duration than Galaxy S21 FE, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy S21 FE costs more money than the nubia Red Magic 3, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.