Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-27 | 2017-04-05 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.68 ounces |
| Black and Red | Black, Blue and Silver |
| Aluminum | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Sony Xperia XZs has an overall score of 77.2, which is just a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3's 75.6 general score. Even though Sony Xperia XZs is incredibly older than nubia Red Magic 3, it's body is thinner and extremely lighter. Nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a little bit better processing power than Xperia XZs, because it has 8 GB more RAM memory and more processing cores.
Sony Xperia XZs and nubia Red Magic 3 count with quite similar screens, because although the Sony Xperia XZs has a lot smaller screen and a bit worse 1080 x 1920px resolution, it also counts with a quite better count of pixels in each inch in the display. The nubia Red Magic 3 has much more storage capacity for games and applications than Sony Xperia XZs, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The nubia Red Magic 3 features a much longer battery lifetime than Xperia XZs, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. Xperia XZs counts with a bit better camera than nubia Red Magic 3, although it has a way lower resolution camera in the back, a tinier aperture, a tinier sensor giving a worse image quality and a lot worse 3840x2160 video quality.
Although Xperia XZs is a better device, it costs more money than the nubia Red Magic 3, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the nubia Red Magic 3. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Xperia XZs, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the nubia Red Magic 3, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.