Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-27 | 2018-04-03 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black and Red | Black and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 639.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is better than the nubia Red Magic 3, with an 83.8 score against 75.6. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is an older cellphone than nubia Red Magic 3, but it is somewhat lighter and thinner anyway. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with a screen that is very similar to the nubia Red Magic 3 one, because although the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a bit worse 1080 x 2160 resolution and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little better display density.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with as much storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos as nubia Red Magic 3, they have equal 256 GB internal storage capacity. The nubia Red Magic 3 features a little bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and although they both have 8 cores, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The nubia Red Magic 3 has a way better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3400mAh. The nubia Red Magic 3 takes greater pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a larger aperture, a camera with a lot higher 48 MP resolution, a much better 7680x4320 video definition and a way larger back-facing camera sensor providing a lot better image quality.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s costs a little more money than nubia Red Magic 3, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.