Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-27 | 2018-11-01 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.22 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Black and Red | Black, Blue and Green |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 is better than nubia Red Magic 3, with a global score of 83.8 against 75.6. Even though the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 and the nubia Red Magic 3 were released with only a few months difference, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 body is somewhat thinner but also just a little bit heavier. Nubia Red Magic 3 features just a little better performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 features a little bit better screen than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 also counts with a quite greater pixels density. Nubia Red Magic 3 has a better camera than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has a way bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a much higher resolution back facing camera, a larger aperture to capture better low-light photos and video and a way higher 7680x4320 video definition.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 features as much storage for games and applications as the nubia Red Magic 3 one, they have exactly the same 256 GB internal storage. The nubia Red Magic 3 features a really longer battery performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.