Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 12 |
| 2019-05-27 | 2022-06-23 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.43 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Black and Red | Moonlight Silver, Nebula Green and Night Black |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F4 is much better than nubia Red Magic 3, having an 87.5 score against 75.6. The Xiaomi Poco F4 is a extremely newer phone, and it's also notably thinner and a bit lighter than the nubia Red Magic 3. These phones have Android operating system, but Xiaomi Poco F4 has the older 12 version while nubia Red Magic 3 has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Xiaomi Poco F4 features a much better looking screen than nubia Red Magic 3, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Xiaomi Poco F4 also has a quite greater pixels density and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px. The nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a way bigger memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Poco F4, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The Xiaomi Poco F4 has a bit better processing power than nubia Red Magic 3, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. Nubia Red Magic 3 features just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi Poco F4, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh. Xiaomi Poco F4 counts with a camera that is just as good as the camera in nubia Red Magic 3, because although the Xiaomi Poco F4 has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for taking images or videos in low light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and a same size sensor, it also counts with faster video frame rate and a camera in the back with a lot higher 64 mega-pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.