Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-05-27 | 2020-02-07 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Black and Red | Black, Ochre and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 11.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 2560 x 1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The ZTE Axon 10s Pro is just a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3, having a 76.6 score against 75.6. Even though the ZTE Axon 10s Pro and the nubia Red Magic 3 were only released with a couple months difference, the ZTE Axon 10s Pro is thinner and somewhat lighter. Both of these phones use the same Android 9.0 Pie OS (Operating System).
Nubia Red Magic 3 has a bit superior processor than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has 6 GB more RAM memory. Nubia Red Magic 3 and ZTE Axon 10s Pro count with similar displays, because although the ZTE Axon 10s Pro has a quite smaller screen, and they both have the same 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a little greater amount of pixels in each inch of screen.
The ZTE Axon 10s Pro features a bigger memory to install games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1000 GB. Nubia Red Magic 3 has superior battery lifetime than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because it has a 25 percent larger battery capacity.
The nubia Red Magic 3 captures much better pictures and videos than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, and although they both have the same resolution camera in the back, a F1.7 aperture and a 0.5 inches sensor, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.