Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Ocean |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has an overall score of 83.1, which is a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 score. These phones use Android OS, but OPPO Find X2 Pro has older 10 version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version. Even when OPPO Find X2 Pro and nubia Red Magic 3S were released with only a few months difference, OPPO Find X2 Pro is a bit lighter and a little thinner.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a bit better processing power than OPPO Find X2 Pro. They have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount. OPPO Find X2 Pro features a better looking screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, and although they both have a same size display, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a greater display pixels density and a higher 1440 x 3168 resolution.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a slightly better camera than nubia Red Magic 3S, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, a F1.7 aperture and a back facing camera with a 48 MP, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has higher 60 frames per second video frame rates and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor which provides a way better image and video quality.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with much more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than nubia Red Magic 3S, because it has more internal storage capacity. Nubia Red Magic 3S has greater battery performance than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.