Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2021-09-30 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Aluminum | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X70 Pro is slightly better than nubia Red Magic 3S, getting a general score of 78.3 against 75.8. Both phones in this review come with Android OS (Operating System), but the vivo X70 Pro has older 11 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie. Vivo X70 Pro's body is newer, lighter and thinner than nubia Red Magic 3S.
The nubia Red Magic 3S and the vivo X70 Pro both have similar displays, because although the vivo X70 Pro has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2376 resolution and a just a bit greater pixel density. The vivo X70 Pro has as much storage capacity to store more apps and games as nubia Red Magic 3S, both have equal 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Vivo X70 Pro has a processing unit that's very similar to the nubia Red Magic 3S one, they have the same RAM memory amount and 8 processing cores. Vivo X70 Pro captures clearer pictures and videos than nubia Red Magic 3S, and although they both have a same size aperture and the same video definition, the vivo X70 Pro also has higher 60 fps video frame rates, a back camera with a better 50 MP resolution and a way bigger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a bit better battery life than vivo X70 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4450mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.