Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 78 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-16 | 2018-07-27 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.25 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Black, Blue, Gold, Pink and Red |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3010mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi A2 has a score of 78, which is a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 global score. Xiaomi Mi A2 is an older device than nubia Red Magic 3S, but Xiaomi made it much lighter and noticeably thinner. The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a bit better performance than Xiaomi Mi A2, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has more RAM.
The Xiaomi Mi A2 and nubia Red Magic 3S both count with incredibly similar screens, because although the Xiaomi Mi A2 has a bit smaller display and a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2160, it also counts with a little bit higher pixels density. Nubia Red Magic 3S features a way bigger memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi A2, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
Nubia Red Magic 3S takes way better videos and photos than Xiaomi Mi A2, because it has a lot better video resolution, a larger aperture to take better low light photos and video, a much larger sensor which gives a much higher photo and video quality and a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
Nubia Red Magic 3S features a very superior battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi A2, because it has a 66 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.