Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 86.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-10-16 | -- |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Cyber shade | -- |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro is better than nubia Red Magic 3S, with a global score of 86.1 against 75.8. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro construction is somewhat thinner and just a little bit lighter than nubia Red Magic 3S. These phones use Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has 11 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has just a bit better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro counts with a little more vivid display than nubia Red Magic 3S, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also has a just a bit higher pixel density and a higher 2080 x 2400 pixels resolution.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro counts with just a bit better camera than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for shooting photographs and video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also counts with a way better 108 MP resolution camera in the back and faster 30 fps video frame rates.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, because it has 256 GB internal memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro features a bit superior battery life than nubia Red Magic 3S, because it has a 5160mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.