Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-10-16 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Blue |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 11.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro has a general score of 80.2, which is a little bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 score. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro construction is lighter and thinner than the nubia Red Magic 3S, even when they were released only a few months apart. Both of these phones have Android OS, but ZTE Axon 10 Pro has an older 10 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Nubia Red Magic 3S features a bit more powerful processor than ZTE Axon 10 Pro. They have 12 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core processor. Nubia Red Magic 3S and ZTE Axon 10 Pro have incredibly similar displays, because although the ZTE Axon 10 Pro has a quite smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340, it also counts with a little higher count of pixels in each screen inch.
ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with much more storage capacity to install applications and games than nubia Red Magic 3S, and although they both have equal internal memory, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Nubia Red Magic 3S has better battery lifetime than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because it has a 25 percent greater battery capacity.
The nubia Red Magic 3S captures clearer photographs and videos than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, and although they both have the same resolution back facing camera and the same aperture, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a way better video definition.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro costs the same than the nubia Red Magic 3S, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.