Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-21 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Hot Rod red and Eclipse black | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 579.00 | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a XL is slightly better than nubia Red Magic 5G, with a 78.9 score against 75.7. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Google Pixel 3a XL has a newer 11 version while nubia Red Magic 5G has Android 10. The Google Pixel 3a XL design is notably lighter and somewhat thinner than the nubia Red Magic 5G, despite of the fact that it was released about 12 months before.
Nubia Red Magic 5G counts with a bit sharper display than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a just a little lower number of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2340px resolution and a quite larger display. The nubia Red Magic 5G has a bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 5G also has more RAM memory.
The nubia Red Magic 5G has a way better camera than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the nubia Red Magic 5G also has better 60 fps video frame rate, a much more mega pixels camera and a way bigger sensor capturing lot better quality videos and photographs.
Nubia Red Magic 5G has a superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity. Nubia Red Magic 5G features better battery performance than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Google Pixel 3a XL not only is the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.