Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-04-21 | 2021-09-30 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Hot Rod red and Eclipse black | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 579.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.32 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X70 Pro has a global score of 78.3, which is a little bit better than the nubia Red Magic 5G's global score of 75.7. Vivo X70 Pro is a newer cellphone, and it is also somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than nubia Red Magic 5G. These devices have Android OS, but the vivo X70 Pro has newer 11 version while nubia Red Magic 5G has Android 10, so it provides you some nice extra features.
The vivo X70 Pro has just a little better hardware performance than nubia Red Magic 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM. Nubia Red Magic 5G counts with just a bit better screen than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a just a little less pixels per inch of display and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a quite larger display.
The nubia Red Magic 5G features just a bit better camera than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low light photography and videos and a smaller sensor capturing worse quality videos and images, and they both have the same 60 fps video frame rate and the same video resolution, the nubia Red Magic 5G also counts with a way more megapixels back-facing camera.
Vivo X70 Pro features a much bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than nubia Red Magic 5G, because it has 256 GB internal memory. Vivo X70 Pro's battery life is very similar to the nubia Red Magic 5G one, although the vivo X70 Pro has just 4450mAh battery size instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.