Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-09-02 | 2021-09-30 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Sonic silver | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 579.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.32 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X70 Pro has a global score of 78.3, which is a little bit better than nubia Red Magic 5S's overall score of 76.2. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but vivo X70 Pro has a more recent 11 version and nubia Red Magic 5S has Android 10 version, so it offers lots of additional features. Vivo X70 Pro is a newer phone, and it is also lighter and somewhat thinner than nubia Red Magic 5S.
The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a little more vivid display than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a little lower screen pixel density and a bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a little larger display. The vivo X70 Pro counts with a bit better processing unit than nubia Red Magic 5S, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has more RAM.
The nubia Red Magic 5S shoots a bit better videos and photos than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor shooting lower quality videos and photographs and a tinier aperture which is not so good for shooting images in low light environments, it also counts with a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels and a way better video quality.
The vivo X70 Pro features much more memory for games and applications than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has 256 GB internal storage. Nubia Red Magic 5S and vivo X70 Pro both count with very similar battery durations, although the vivo X70 Pro has just 4450mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.