Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-14 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.25 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Diamond black and Twilight blue | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 549.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XR is much better than nubia Z20, having a global score of 82 against 71.9. IPhone XR's design is just a little bit thinner than nubia Z20, but it is just a little bit heavier and was released about 12 months before. IPhone XR features a little bit better processing power than nubia Z20, because although it has lesser RAM and an inferior number of cores and they are also slower, it also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
The nubia Z20 has a little sharper display than Apple iPhone XR, because although it has way less brightness, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px, a bit bigger display and a quite greater number of pixels in each inch of display. Nubia Z20 has a way bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than iPhone XR, because it has 128 GB internal memory.
The nubia Z20 shoots better photos and videos than iPhone XR, because it has a bigger camera aperture for better low-light photos and video, a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality, a lot larger sensor and a way higher resolution back camera. Nubia Z20 counts with superior battery performance than Apple iPhone XR, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2942mAh.
The iPhone XR costs more than the nubia Z20, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.