Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-10-14 | 2019-11-01 |
| 6.25 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Diamond black and Twilight blue | Aurora black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 549.00 | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.22 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G8X ThinQ is better than nubia Z20, having a overall score of 82.7 against 71.9. The LG G8X ThinQ design is a bit thinner but a little heavier than the nubia Z20, and both of them were only released 1 months apart. Both phones in this comparison use Android OS (Operating System), but the LG G8X ThinQ has older 10 version while nubia Z20 has Android 9.0 Pie.
The nubia Z20 has a bit more vivid screen than LG G8X ThinQ. Both of them have a screen of the same size, a better pixels count per inch in the display and exactly the same 1080 x 2340 resolution. The LG G8X ThinQ counts with a superior storage for games and applications than nubia Z20, and although they both have the same internal storage, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The nubia Z20 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than LG G8X ThinQ, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Z20 also has a greater amount of RAM. Nubia Z20 has a better camera than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has a bigger aperture for better low-light images and video, a much better video quality, a way larger back-facing camera sensor taking way higher quality videos and photographs and a camera in the back with a lot higher 48 mega pixels resolution.
LG G8X ThinQ has a battery life that is just as good as the nubia Z20 one.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the LG G8X ThinQ is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.