Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-10-14 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.25 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Diamond black and Twilight blue | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 549.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto Z Force is just a bit better than nubia Z20, getting a 75.8 score against 71.9. These devices work with Android OS, but Moto Z Force has 7.0 Nougat version and nubia Z20 has Android 9.0 Pie. Moto Z Force is an older cellphone than nubia Z20, but it is thinner and somewhat lighter anyway.
Nubia Z20 has a bit better processing power than Moto Z Force, because it has 4 GB more RAM memory and 4 more CPU cores. The Moto Z Force features just a bit better display than nubia Z20, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and more pixels per inch in the screen.
The Moto Z Force has a much greater memory to store more games and applications than nubia Z20, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. Nubia Z20 counts with a bit longer battery duration than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Nubia Z20 counts with a superior camera than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has a larger camera aperture, a camera in the back with a lot better 48 mega pixels resolution and a way higher video quality.
The Moto Z Force not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also a lot cheaper, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.